On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:19:10 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Agreed. I had this discussion recently too along the topic of:
Should we
allow people to install libphobos/libdruntime in a common
library
directory, or keep it private as an integral part of the
compiler? IMO,
giving given it's close ties between the two, it should always
be integral,
and the idea of linking against libphobos from an application
written in
something other than D is still not in any way feasible task.
I thought about asking your advice on this topic but it was not
urgent enough :) What currently prevents having different
runtimes but single phobos library for different compilers? How
hard is such setup to achieve?
