On 27 June 2013 14:40, Joakim <joa...@airpost.net> wrote: > On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:25:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote: >> >> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:18:01 UTC, Joakim wrote: >>> >>> Look, I get it, you guys are religious zealots- you tip your hand when >>> you allude to ethical or moral reasons for using open source, a crazy idea >>> if there ever was one- and you will come up with all kinds of silly >>> arguments in the face of overwhelming evidence that _pure_ open source has >>> failed. >> >> >> Most replies to you have been quite measured and reasonable. I'm not sure >> what justifies you calling people zealots. > > Read the rest of the sentence which you quoted, my reasons are stated. When > I come across so many arguments that are _factually_ wrong- "the Artistic > license doesn't allow closing source," "most linux installs don't use binary > blobs"- I know I'm dealing with religious zealots.
Which is quite amusing, as those quotes aren't found anywhere in this thread. :o) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
