yip, :) can't think of a reason except it was interesting. wish dmd didn't
segfault when I used __MODULE__.
on the plus side the requirement for a non basic type is the same
requirement that #golang has on its interfaces.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Dicebot <pub...@dicebot.lv> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 10:33:26 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
>> I have a basic solution but it can't handle basic types LOL! you have to
>> typedef them so that moduleName!T works.
> Of course it can't, built-in types don't have any owning module, those are
> not symbols. Why would you want to care about basic types anyway?