On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 13:31:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-10-17 11:33, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
There has been another important change that requires existing packages to be updated: All packages must now have the fields "description" and "license" present to be published. The license field has to be set according to the specification [1]. All existing branches and version tags stay unaffected by this requirement and are still available.

Perhaps add the license: Apple Public Source License. This can be useful for creating bindings to Apple specific libraries. Is there a corresponding license for Microsoft?

Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL)
Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL)

Reply via email to