On Thursday, 2 January 2014 at 10:59:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-01-02 02:12, Dylan Knutson wrote:
It didn't before, because of how the semantics of eRuby syntax
works,
but now it does! It seemed like an important thing to
support...
Here's an example mimicking a subset of Rails' `form_for`
helper:
[Snip]
Nice. Do you have any concept of safe vs unsafe strings?
No, but that's been on the to-do list. I feel like safe vs.
unsafe strings are tied heavily with the escaping of unsafe
strings, which is specific to a language, so I think the best way
to go about this is to provide:
- A way to define custom "string" types (like a struct wrapping
a string tracking if it's safe or not)
- Callbacks for processing all of the string-ey things written
to the output buffer, to decide if something should be escaped or
not.
