On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 15:44:07 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Phobos has a very strict "don't break backwards compatibility rule".
IMHO too strict, but that's the way it is.

This is also the reason why I would have voted "no" if I made it in time. Documentation and implementation can be fixed later, but we would have had to support a borderline-broken API (with regards to type stringification) for the foreseeable future.


Reply via email to