Walter Bright, el 26 de May a las 11:09 me escribiste:
> On 5/26/2014 10:30 AM, w0rp wrote:
> >On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 17:06:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>Youtube has solved all these problems - why not use it?
> >You can view .webm directly in recent Firefox or Chrome versions on Windows, 
> >you
> >an also view .webm in IE9 and above provided you have the right codecs
> >installed. It's a perfectly acceptable format.
> It doesn't work on the browser that comes with Windows. That makes
> it undesirable if you wish to reach the largest audience with the
> least friction.
> Why restrict the audience if you don't have to? What is gained by
> using .webm that would offset the reduced audience?

And there is something magical about digital media. Adding a copy to
YouTube doesn't mean your webm copy will vanish. Just have both and
everybody is happy. :)

Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)           
El trabajo no sólo tara, sino que tarará y seguirá tararando.
        -- Ricardo Vaporeso

Reply via email to