Yeah, to expect people to register on LiveJournal in this age of
Facebook... Sorry about that; It must have been to deter the
Thanks for taking the time to comment! Your solution with the
single call to mixin() is much more elegant. I made a version 2
which uses it.
The reason I used a double mixin() was that the first thing I
tried was mixin("foreach() etc. etc."), which I think may have
failed due to the foreach, then mixin("defineMain();"); , which
was interpreted as a function declaration, and then I went
straight for the mixin("mixin()"); . If it ain't broke, et cetera.
I still think the double mixin() can compete in terms of comedy
value, though, don't you think?
Also, thanks for pointing out UFCS. It seems like a very
convenient, not to mention SANE alternative to monkey patching,
and it'll make it even more seamless to port code that makes use
of that mechanism.
- Re: Pushing D's mixin to the li... Rounin via Digitalmars-d-announce