Does this 2.67 release contain COFF32, and the new package fix?
On 28 August 2014 07:45, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce < firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On 8/27/2014 2:27 PM, Dicebot wrote: > >> Let's get them reviewed/pulled and do a 2.066 point release. >>> >> >> Very true but this does not conflict with 2.067 cycle (other than >> competing for >> attention of compiler developers) >> > > You're right, somehow I misread 2.067 as 2.066. My mistake. >