On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 10:30:38 UTC, uri wrote:
This is great, thanks.
Something I personally would find useful is a comparison
between the C++ way and idiomatic D with Phobos. I finding
coming from C/C++ to D very easy but I'm always wondering if
I'm doing things the "D" way.
Cheers,
uri
I'm not familiar with the terse, range-heavy, UFCS style that has
emerged from Phobos so I'm not sure if I can write that.
What could help is a list of tasks for which you asked yourself
what the "D" way was. Is there one?
