On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 12:21:05 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 11:51:24 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Yes. `cerealise` and `decerealise`. The former is slightly
weird for performance reasons. It takes a lambda that tells it
what to do with the resulting bytes.
Close with LDC and DMD, faster with GDC:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
Nice!
Are there any plans to add different backends (for instance
msgpack) to Cereal? Then we could have one package to rule them
all!
I've thought about that (and even JSON or XML) but I'm not 100%
convinced that it would work with the existing, and more
importantly to me, not high on my list of priorities. I'm
definitely not opposed to it.
I'll try Cereal in favor of msgpack next time!
Thanks, Atila!
Glad to be useful. :)
Atila
