On 08/06/2015 01:06 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 at 23:38:22 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 at 20:57:49 UTC, anonymous wrote:
getUDAs and getSymbolsByUDA don't seem to have made it, so they're
correctly commented out for now.
That's annoying. Those three were meant to go together.
It is unfortunate, should we drop hasUDA out of stable?
If anybody cares, I've already updated my book by replacing a
hand-written function with hasUDA. (Sometimes I feel too efficient. :p)