On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 15:04:08 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 15:01:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 12:20:23 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
Are dmd 2.069b1 binaries compiled with dmd 2.069b1 or with
dmd 2.068.2?
The last released compiler, we don't have any bootstrap method
(using a small C++ compiler or so).
One does not exclude the other. You could still re-build
2.069b1 using itself.
— David
Sure, just to know which option is used.
I think rebuilding 2.069b1 with 2.069b1 could help to find bugs
and, of course, can takes advantages from the new improvements...
am I missing something?
