On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 15:13:15 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
But that's more or less what he's saying though, if you read his original blog post.


Just to add further: while I have a lot of doubts about the motives behind the original blogpost (which I feel misleads by omission on several counts), remember that my original response was to someone posting an article whose title was "Ubuntu 16.04's new snap format is a security risk".

That's outright FUD and it deserves to be challenged strongly.

Reply via email to