On Saturday, 23 April 2016 at 15:13:15 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
But that's more or less what he's saying though, if you read
his original blog post.
Just to add further: while I have a lot of doubts about the
motives behind the original blogpost (which I feel misleads by
omission on several counts), remember that my original response
was to someone posting an article whose title was "Ubuntu 16.04's
new snap format is a security risk".
That's outright FUD and it deserves to be challenged strongly.