On Sunday, 15 May 2016 at 10:29:21 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 05/10/2016 08:45 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
overhead and complexity over an AST interpreter. If you want to go really fast you need some sort of JIT anyhow, but a proper interpreter will be orders of mangnitude faster than the current implementation.


If you are going to have fast evaluation of loops/recursion then you need to use a solver. And well, doing worse than O(log N) at compile time is a very bad idea.

Why not start with the most difficult case first? Then the simple cases will resolve themselves for free, most likely.

Reply via email to