On 05/15/2016 02:02 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Correct. A ByteCode Interpreter will add even more implementation
> overhead, and the benefit is only realizable if the ByteCode  is a
> standard format that can be read other backends such as a jit.

This indeed would be an interesting proposal, interpretable IR that is
portable between the backends. But I guess we won't find such IR or at
least need to lower it into RealIR for dmd/gcc/llvm.
Sounds like an interesting candidate for the next GSoC.

Reply via email to