On 21 May 2016 at 10:23, Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 23:16:01 UTC, Richard Delorme wrote: >> >> >> The source can be compiled with dmd, ldc or gdc, but the best performance >> are obtained with the latter (almost twice faster). > > > Can you give cmdline details and compiler version data for this? (how much > faster is gdc relative to ldc?) >
I think he meant that ldc or gdc is twice as fast.
