On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 14:28:03 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:


if ((a && b) || (a && c)) {//bla}

This is now solved although quite naively at the cost of inserting twice the number of instructions for thoose cases.
Then agian we are still much faster then the old interpreter.
And I can still optimize this if it should turn out to be a bottleneck.

Tomorrow I will fix the regressed string handling.

Reply via email to