On 2016-10-02 14:37, Martin Nowak wrote:
Yes, that's how it should be, but don't both deprecations contain enough information to replace old code?
Yeah, I see that now. I didn't notice it at first. It's not as clear as I would like. I would like it to explicitly state "To this instead: ...".
I think it could be more clear why it's deprecated and what to do instead: Language construct A is deprecated. A is bad because: ... Do this instead: ... -- /Jacob Carlborg
