On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 21:21:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 14:12:30 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
[...]
The paragraph I like the most there is: "The other important
difference is that deferred_heap meets C++'s zero-overhead
principle by being opt-in and granular, not default and global"
That is what I like the most about Herb's work...
We already have opt-in for the most part and I've been pushing
for granular with isolated since at least 2014. So yeah, Herb's
proposal is old news, but worse, it is kind of disappointing
that it is anything new for the D community. I'm not sure if I
or the community failed, but clearly there is a major failure
here.
I don't know about failing - the isolated thing immediately
reminded me of your proposal.
Atila
