On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:51:55 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote:
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it
will be allowed as dependency for DMD.
LLVM is purely optional.
A pure D interpreter exists.
LLVM optimises most ctfe btw and returns constants.
If anyone want to take a look the lastest llvm_backend
development is happening here :