On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:51:55 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote:
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:


That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it will be allowed as dependency for DMD.

---
Dmitry Olshansky

LLVM is purely optional.
A pure D interpreter exists.

LLVM optimises most ctfe btw and returns constants.

If anyone want to take a look the lastest llvm_backend development is happening here :
https://github.com/UplinkCoder/dmd/blob/_ctfe/src/bc_llvm_backend.d

Reply via email to