On Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 11:37:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical
feature would need to be include qualitatively new
motivation/evidence of usefulness.
Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
There should be no need for me to repeat the arguments against
the DIP process already made by others. I will be submitting no
more DIPs or engaging in the process in any way unless and until
it is significantly changed.