I would probably call it gnublas or gplblas something to make it clear that
it's got that aspect to it.
It can't ever really be "the one true" blas lib for all D users with that

Re: merging with Mir GLAS, that seems very tricky without changing Mir
GLAS's license to GPL.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 09:18:06 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
>> I have just finished the first version of a BLAS implementation for D
>> mostly done by code conversion from GSL's BLAS module
>> https://github.com/dataPulverizer/dblas
>> It is complete functionally with respect covering all the functions
>> implemented in BLAS. @9il has suggested that we should work to merge this
>> library with Mir GLAS which I think is a good idea.
>> As the readme says the next phase is:
>> * Performance optimization
>> * Complete unit test coverage
>> * Type specific BLAS aliases
>> Thanks
>> p.s. Sorry for originally positing this in the General Forum, it should
>> be here instead
>> ---
>> DP
> Really good stuff! I see no reason for calling it dblas (the package) -
> simple `blas` would do I think... :)

Reply via email to