On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 12:04:36 UTC, data pulverizer wrote:
On Sunday, 11 June 2017 at 01:59:37 UTC, 9il wrote:
Why not to use ndslice and Lubeck  libraries instead?
It is already has hight level ndslice interface for inv
(inverse) and mtimes (matmul).
p.p.s Okay, I can see how writing an article using D's latest
numerical library will help increase knowledge of packages in
the ecosystem. Fair enough. I shall look into re-writing to
See also mir.ndslice.algorithm and mir.ndslice.topology. They are
more efficient then Phobos analogs. For example,
mir.ndslice.algorithm (each, reduce and others) can iterate
multiple ndslice at once, while Phobos requires to not efficient