On Thursday, 24 August 2017 at 03:31:02 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 at 17:44:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 13:12:04 Mike Parker via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
I confess that I tend to think of betterC as a waste of time.
Clearly, there are folks who find it useful, but it loses so
much that I see no point in using it for anything unless I
have no choice. As long as attempts to improve it don't
negatively impact normal D, then I don't really care what
happens with it, but it's clearly not for me.
And it _is_ possible to use full-featured D from C/C++ when D
does not control main. It's just more of a pain.
- Jonathan M Davis
Totally agree with this.
I disagree, I believe BetterC is worth the time.