On 2017-09-04 10:12, Boris-Barboris wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 06:40:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
If would be great if you want to upstream your improvements.
I think it's a bit unfortunate that everyone is rolling their own
implementations in this community instead of working together. I would
say that it's rare to need direct access to the messages of the
protocol. But perhaps the library can be better structured in
layers/levels, allowing the user to pick the most suitable level for
I did try (for example https://github.com/teamhackback/hb-ddb/pull/38,
branch with the buffer:
Ah, ok. I didn't know about hb-ddb until you started this thread. I'm
currently one of the maintainers of ddb and I haven't seen anything
up until the point I understood I dislike it so much it would be easier
for me to rewrite it. Amount of possible message combinations made me
write some hack methods like prepare_and_bind, bind_and_query,
bind_and_execute... I kinda gave up.