On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:25:43 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Thanks, examples are nice for packages.
Examples are a good way to check that the definitions are really
working. My first version was really buggy.
Wondering a little about the std. usage, as it seems very
ever become standardized.
Why not just use sap. or netweaver. as top level package?
It was just of a lack of a better name. Thinking about it I like
the "netweaver." package name.
Also I can recommend at least some basic ddoc comments, it's
really trivial to use ddox to get some nice documentation, e.g.
If you use x:ddoxFilterArgs without "--only-documented", it
should even work for undocumented functions.
Yeah, documentation is a bit weak. Currently, there is not much
more than the official C API (for which you can download the
documentation) with some D tuning. But I now start adding more
functions and I will consider your hint.
Thanks for your feedback!