On Saturday, February 10, 2018 21:10:28 Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Saturday, 10 February 2018 at 18:57:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > On Saturday, February 10, 2018 16:14:41 Jacob Carlborg via > > > > Digitalmars-d- announce wrote: > >> On 2018-02-09 22:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > >> > [...] > >> > >> This is great news! Have you run any benchmarks to see how it > >> performs? > > > > Kind of. I did some benchmarking to see if some code changes > > would improve performance, but I haven't tried benchmarking it > > against any other XML libraries. That would take a fair bit of > > time and effort, and IMHO, that would be better spent finishing > > the library first. Also, ldc's latest release is only up to dmd > > 2.077.1, and dxml needs an improvement that got added to > > byCodeUnit in 2.078.0, so any benchmarking that wants to do > > something like compare dxml with a C/C++ parsing library while > > taking the optimizer out of the equation isn't going to work > > yet unless I fork byCodeUnit for dxml until we get another > > release of ldc. > > ldc master uses the latest 2.078.2 frontend and stdlib, you could > always build it yourself: > > https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L54 > https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_from_source
That's good to know. Thanks. If I get to the point where I want to do more benchmarking before ldc does another release, I'll build it myself, though depending on when I reach that point and when ldc plans to do another release, it may or may not end up being necessary. - Jonathan M Davis
