On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 19:31:27 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
If that were to be done again here are a few points that I'd
improve:
- there are many occurences of open questions where I entered a
text only to find that the next fixed-choice question was about
what I had written. I therefore feel like open questions should
be asked as late as possible.
Ok. Understood. I tried to avoid this, but I obviously
(partially) failed.
- some questions introduce clear bias as they don't have a
clear default exit path.
For example for "How would you rate the importance of having
documentation and error messages translated into your native
language?" I feel like english speakers should have a way to
exit cleanly as clearly they are both more numerous than the
counter part (I think) and less likely to feel a need for
supporting other languages.
...
Good point! There are a few questions that already have logic
jumps (e.g. you get only asked about your experience with the
DTour if you actually said that you used it), but I obviously
missed that one. It's too late for that one now, but I will
definitely keep this in mind for 2019.
(also TypeForms so called "smart" jumps are severely limited, but
you got to use what you have.)
- I don't know if typeform allows it but sometimes having a
link to the feature discussion or library reference would have
been great. I didn't had to search many of them to actually
know what the survey was talking about (which doesn't always
indicate that I'm not concerned about the consequences of the
change).
TypeForm only allows a general description for questions which
very limited Markdown (not even link support, only raw links).
Anyhow, the feedback: "better descriptions" for questions is
noted. Thanks!
That said, it was a very complete survey, thanks to everybody
involved in putting this up! I hope it'll be of some use to the
foundation.
Thanks! I hope so too!
