On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 16:10:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What's the philosophy around accepted DIPs containing multiple
suggestions/alternatives. For example, this DIP mentions three
alternatives for the "out" syntax , it's not crystal clear
which one was actually accepted.
I think the philosophy is just that it's good to record the
thought process which led in the final suggestion. The DIP does
recommend syntax option 3 for "out" contracts, which is also the
only one described in the grammar. This could be clearer, but now
I want to change the language spec, which obviously matters a
whole lot more, now that the DIP has been accepted.