On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 10:37:52 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 04:40:37 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/08/2018 05:05 AM, Cym13 wrote:
[...]
No, it really doesn't mean the same thing at all. Not when you
look away from the unimportant implementation details and
towards the big picture:
[...]
With UFCS I find that in my code a dot means "function
composition" more often than "is a member of". Maybe it's just
that I like writting in a functional style, but UFCS chains are
very much endorsed by the language, so I wouldn't call it a
stretch.
I agree with this in this case.
