On Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 10:43:40 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
Destructors are not called for fields embedded in unions.

On the one hand this is a horrible, horrible hack. On the other, whee!

Not only a horrible hack, but a bug, and something you really can't rely on working in the future. Especially since this behavior is only observed with named unions, not with anonymous ones.

I'll also mention section 14.19 2 on the Structs, Unions page (https://dlang.org/spec/struct.html):

2. Unions may not have fields that have destructors.

Whether that means it's undefined behavior or the compiler should statically disallow it is up for debate, I guess.

--
  Simen

Reply via email to