On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 14:30:14 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Last time I checked, it should be me and yshui's named
parameter DIP's next, they really need to be reviewed together
though, at least initially.
I'm not at all thrilled by the idea of running two DIPs through
the queue in concert and would prefer to avoid that circumstance.
I've already discussed this with Yuxuan and asked if he'd be
willing work together with you on a single DIP. His response was
that the two proposals are not mutually exclusive and that yours
could be built on top of his.
I need to take the time to fully absorb both DIPs and then I'll
decide how to approach it. But you'll be hearing from me as soon
as I do.
- DIP Draft Reviews Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
- DIP Draft Reviews Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP Draft Reviews Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP Draft Rev... rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP Draft... Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP ... Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP ... Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: ... Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Dukc via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Dukc via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce