On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 00:05:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:58:39 AM MDT aliak via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
This will break compilation of current code that has an
explicit copy constructor, and the fix is simply to add the
attribute @implicit.
In that case, why not just use a transitional compiler switch?
Why force everyone to mark their copy constructors with
@implicit forever? The whole point of adding the attribute was
to avoid breaking existing code.
- Jonathan M Davis
Well one breaks compilation and the other is silent code changes.
And No.compilerSwitch > Yes.compilerSwitch when possible.
I'm actually not strongly for @implicit btw.
