Re: DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment

[Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 28 January 2019 at 17:23:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
* Regarding the argument "why not make this an iterative 
process where concerns are raised and incrementally addressed?" 
We modeled the DIP process after similar processes - conference 
papers, journal papers, proposals in other languages. There is 
a proposal by one or more responsibles, perfected by a 
community review, and submitted for review. This encourages 
building a strong proposal - as strong as can be - prior to 
submission. Washing that down to a negotiation between the 
proposers and the reviewers leads to a "worst acceptable 
proposal" state of affairs in which proposers are incentivized 
to submit the least-effort proposal, reactively change it as 
issues are raised by reviewers.

Fair enough.