On 2/25/19 1:39 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2019-02-25 17:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

The proposers (Razvan and myself) and Walter (the reviewer) do not know how to make DIP 1018 better.

That shouldn't justify accepting a DIP that might contain problems.

Definitely.

But of course, if you don't think there are any problems.

Not talking for Walter, but generally acceptance implies that.

Reply via email to