On 23.07.19 10:20, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 July 2019 at 04:02:50 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 21.07.19 02:17, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/20/2019 3:39 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Do you mean to keep track of ownership/borrowedness manually?
No, that's what the copyctor/opAssign/dtor semantics so.
This is not true.
I thought as much. Thanks for the confirmation. I am considering moving
to pointers to benefit from the future semantics. It's just that I don't
like pointers that much...
I think tying ownership/borrowing semantics to pointers instead of
structs makes no sense; it's not necessary and it's not sufficient. Your
use case illustrates why it is not sufficient.
