I'm making a change to the way we solicit feedback during DIP review rounds. The goal is to separate explicit feedback from discussion. Discussion is vital to the process, but it also makes it difficult to find the actionable feedback buried in the 20+ pages that some DIP reviews generate (particularly Walter's). So henceforward, we're going with two threads per review round: one for discussion and one for feedback (critique).

It's all laid out in this blog post:

https://dlang.org/blog/2020/01/26/dip-reviews-discussion-vs-feedback/

Also on reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/d_language/comments/eu4fi8/dip_reviews_discussion_vs_feedback/

Reply via email to