On Saturday, 29 February 2020 at 00:57:54 UTC, aliak wrote:
Also another note, this tuple expansion should really not be called string interpolation, since it does not result in a string :/ It's more string expansion really.

Yeah, me and Steven agreed on this too in the other thread, and I thought I updated my DIP but I guess not.

wait a minute yes i did https://gist.github.com/adamdruppe/a58f097d974b364ae1cbc8c050dd9a3f

on the gist version, I called it "Formatted string tuple literals", but I never saved tht back to my local or github versions. oops.

But basically I see our new thing as being a string builder rather than a string per se.
              • ... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... aliak via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... aliak via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... aliak via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: DIP 1027---String Inte... Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to