On Wednesday, 6 May 2020 at 22:28:28 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2020 at 10:54:55 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
[snip]
Thanks, but: Some of the files have Apache license, but some
have none. I think you should add a license to the whole
repository that would cover those files that don't have their
own.
This library has potential license issues as it has many files,
at least on the core section that come from OpenJDK. Even the
Java specific comments have been left I, such as this in
AbstractCollection.d . The OpenJDK is GPL with static linking
exception. It probably isn't kosher to take those files and make
them Apache 2.0, even with modifications.
This class is a member of the
* <a
href="{@docRoot}/java/util/package-summary.html#CollectionsFramework">
* Java Collections Framework</a>
