On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 17:54:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 22 May 2020 at 17:41:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
And so, you are free to pepper your @safe code with dangling
pointers. Sure, you can claim that the C++ library didn't
"corrupt your code", which is the case for ALL libraries if
you use them properly. You did it, you created a dangling
pointer, not the library.
Right. And the point I was trying to make wasn't "look at what
I did, it's cool". No, what I did was dumb. So dumb it took you
no time at all to point out one of my mistakes. My point is
that the result of making declarations implicity @system
instead of @safe would make people just slap @safe on them
without really thinking about it to get their code to compile.
Like I did.
So force people to slap @trusted instead, via compiler complains,
not @safe, and reviewers will catch the laziness: why this is
worst that what you picture?
