On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 4:56 AM Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > As far as I can tell, Walter understands the issues but fundamentally > disagrees with pretty much everyone else on the issue.
I do not think so, the issue is, that there could be more people who agree with Walter (like me), but because we agree we do not participate. > He seems to think > that weakening @safe is worth doing, because it will ultimately mean that > more code will be treated as @safe and mechnically checked by the compiler, And I believe he is right. > whereas most everyone else thinks that weakening @safe is unacceptable. You make bad assumptions, who is "most everyone else"? I have only see few members of dlang arguing about that. But there is much bigger community around there. > But since Walter managed to convince Atila, the DIP has been accepted. > > - Jonathan M Davis > So everything is OK right?