On Monday, 1 June 2020 at 21:25:02 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2020 at 19:51:34 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
[...]
Yeah, mir is kind of bare bones for some stuff.
I had meant to include the link before
https://github.com/libmir/numir/pull/10
If you look at some of the unittests you can see how it's
different. I separated out the different tensors with extra
lines between them, which isn't as easy to read. However, I
think bigger than a 3-d tensor is relatively uncommon. It might
be some work to get it to work since all the functions would
need to be re-written to take into account the mir's new format
facilities, but I probably wouldn't have to change the
unittests too much.
[...]
I see. I shall take a look, thanks.
