On Friday, 13 November 2020 at 15:22:03 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Friday, 13 November 2020 at 13:41:50 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
It sounds like maybe your time would be better spent improving
the official D documentation to say which features and
libraries are compatible with betterC and which are not.
Not really. It is a waste of time trying to do that.
Why is it a waste of time? If I understand your proposal
correctly, you will be doing more or less the same work either
way--that is, figuring out which features and libraries still
work with certain language features disabled. The only difference
is whether you write up your results in a separate document, or
incorporate them into the official documentation.
