On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 13:41:17 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad wrote:
On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 13:17:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 11:21:16 UTC, Igor Shirkalin wrote:
[snip]

Agreed. As a matter of fact the simplest convolutions of tensors are out of date. It is like there's no need to calculate inverse matrix. Mir is the usefull work for author, of course, and practically almost not used. Every one who needs something fast in his own tasks should make same things again in D.

"no need to calculate inverse matrix" What? Since when?

I dont know what he meant in this context, but a common technique in computer graphics is to build the inverse as as you apply computations.

It makes sense for simplest cases if matrices are small (2x2, 3x3 or even 4x4) and you have to multiply them at least thousands of times.
        • Re: Mir vs. Nu... 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: Mir vs... data pulverizer via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: M... 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... data pulverizer via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • R... Igor Shirkalin via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Mir vs. Numpy: Reworked... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to