On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 17:07:16 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:54:56 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 16:43:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
[...]
If I am correct Dlang doesn't provide an instrument to
validate it, isn't it?
What alternative is possible?
Returning it by value isn't acceptable at least because of
performance reasons: the first target of the library is struts
with a lot of Mir ref-counted fields.
Mark it @system then.
[...]
This is why it is the market as `trusted`. It is much more
convenient than forcing users to wrap each access with
@trusted lambda, which feels like masochism.
@trusted makes the exact same promise to the user as @safe.
If your method doesn't have a safe interface, don't mark it
@safe or @trusted. Mark it @system.
Hmm, maybe it worth changing the API a bit. Needs to wait for
mir-core 1.2.x thought.
