On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 17:08:26 UTC, 9il wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16486
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10884
and the oldest one reported in 2008
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807
C++ templates can be resolved, at least at the level Mir needs
this. So, it is a bug in my opinion. But it was said the DIP is
required. I can't write DIP well and was very happy that
Stefanos wrote the DIP and even the druft.
Yes, if something is perceived as bug it becomes a burden to
remember that it is isn't. Not sure why anyone resist this
improvement. Hm, he seems to be a compiler consultant now, but no
longer interested in D?
Maybe the DIP should have pushed harder on what other languages
support (might be viewed as a stronger political argument).
I see how builtin tuples could be useful for a linalg library.
I like how Python allows just using ",". Makes code easier on
the eyes
x,y = y,x
It is also very desired for lazy zipped tensors.
I don't use tensors much, how does it help zipping?
I sometimes wonder if linalg primitives should be builtin too.
Seems like that could allow for better compiler optimization.
