On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 02:31:36 UTC, Murilo wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official". That is a deliberate attempt to fracture.
I'm sorry you see it like this but my intention when I created the group was to expand Dlang by bringing it to places people couldn't find it yet. The whole point of the FB group is to aggregate people into our community, to bring more people to Dlang and make Dlang famous. My whole intention was to help our community grow, not fracture.

I have no issues with what you do or don't do. I have issues with the complete lack of strategic visions and decision making on multiple levels in the D community. The question is not what you should or should not do, but how the D community approach community building and respond to changes in the environment.

Just redirect people who cannot get their problems resolved in your group to the learn forum then they get the best of both worlds. :-)

No, what I find disturbing is that people don't think long term and that the greater world is viewed as something that "just happens". It is quite obvious that Go and Rust is doing a better job at putting forth visions for the language, making strategic choices and executing. They also do so in terms of community out reach.

Quite frankly, right now, fracturing is the only possibility for D. The current setup without solid moderation of the D forums cannot sustain a large population. When the number of participants is large the community will get more toxic. Which is not good.

Also, it is a problem that the learn forum is hidden away.

So fracturing on your part, is not the main issue, the main issue is that nobody has a strategy for making sure that the main hub can grow nor is there a strategy for making sure that people gravitate towards it. The strategy seems to be to make it less visible to avoid that people find it. ;-)

It would not surprise me if you manage to grow your group to a 50/50 split. Is that a fracture, sure. But, right now, fracturing is envitable if growth is to take place anyway. The source for this would not be what you do, but what the D community is unwilling to do (or think about).


        • Re: Our commu... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: Our c... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Murilo via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Our community seems to... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to