On 25.01.21 11:05, Imperatorn wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2021 at 06:59:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 25.01.21 07:46, Imperatorn wrote:
Proposed solution:
Archive issues older than 10 years (and maybe some critera based on
latest updated). If they are relevant, it's the authors
responsibility to update the issue so that it's reproducible in the
latest release.
#reasonablebutcontroversial
Just no. Reproducibility is a criterion. Age isn't.
Sure, but how do you define it?
If you need reproducibility to be defined, please stay away from the
issue tracker.