On Friday, 14 May 2021 at 17:38:54 UTC, Danny Arends wrote:
Hmm, things gotta have a license, why not GPL would CC0 be
better? is attribution and sharing code so weird ?
I think: "license": "proprietary" also doesn't sound very
inviting
It's a WIP tutorial project. It is not finished yet. It needs
more details where needed and have everything re-checked.
Any suggestions license-wise ?
zlib, Boost, BSD/MIT, anything will do, its just the GPL itself.
I don't think it is allowed to copy-paste any part of it at all.
Licensing is pain and I usually avoid it, so please refer to
special web sites that will help pick the license that suit your
intentions.
Or at least make it LGPL so it is possible to be used as a
library without licensing headache.
